China pr - League One
2026 ▼
Stats ▼
Latest results
Matches
Form Tables
Goals
Halftime
Timing
First Goal stats
Results Grid
Home & Away tables
Tables by Date
Wide table
Points Performance Index
Run-in Analysis
Projected Points
Total Goals
Goal Ranges
Average Goals
Scored vs Conceded
Goal Margins
Lead Durations
Current Streaks
Equalizers
Leagues ▼
China PR - league-one: Goals
Membership Simulator:
Goals Scored + Conceded
| Teams (Total) ↕ | GP ↕ | Avg ↕ | 0.5+ ↕ | 1.5+ ↕ | 2.5+ ↕ | 3.5+ ↕ | 4.5+ ↕ | 5.5+ ↕ | BTS ↕ | CS ↕ | FTS ↕ | WTN ↕ | LTN ↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foshan Nashi FC | 29 | 3.34 | 97% | 83% | 59% | 45% | 34% | 14% | 59% | 14% | 31% | 10% | 28% |
| Changchun Yatai | 29 | 3.14 | 100% | 86% | 69% | 38% | 14% | 7% | 69% | 17% | 14% | 17% | 14% |
| Jiangxi Dingnan Unit | 29 | 3.10 | 93% | 83% | 55% | 31% | 21% | 17% | 76% | 14% | 17% | 7% | 10% |
| Meizhou Hakka | 29 | 2.97 | 97% | 79% | 62% | 34% | 17% | 7% | 52% | 14% | 38% | 10% | 34% |
| Guangzhou E-Power FC | 29 | 2.93 | 97% | 86% | 55% | 31% | 14% | 7% | 62% | 31% | 10% | 28% | 7% |
| Shaanxi Union FC | 29 | 2.86 | 93% | 79% | 66% | 31% | 14% | 3% | 48% | 34% | 24% | 28% | 17% |
| Guangxi Hengchen | 29 | 2.79 | 97% | 69% | 52% | 24% | 17% | 14% | 55% | 31% | 17% | 28% | 14% |
| Wuxi Wugou | 29 | 2.72 | 97% | 79% | 48% | 28% | 14% | 7% | 45% | 31% | 28% | 28% | 24% |
| Dalian Kuncheng City | 29 | 2.69 | 90% | 76% | 48% | 28% | 14% | 3% | 62% | 17% | 31% | 7% | 21% |
| Shenzhen Juniors FC | 29 | 2.55 | 79% | 62% | 45% | 31% | 17% | 10% | 41% | 45% | 34% | 24% | 14% |
| Yanbian Longding | 29 | 2.48 | 86% | 72% | 48% | 24% | 10% | 3% | 52% | 31% | 31% | 17% | 17% |
| Shanghai Jiading Hui | 29 | 2.41 | 90% | 66% | 45% | 21% | 17% | 3% | 52% | 28% | 31% | 17% | 21% |
| Suzhou Dongwu | 29 | 2.41 | 86% | 62% | 45% | 28% | 10% | 7% | 55% | 24% | 34% | 10% | 21% |
| Nanjing City | 29 | 2.34 | 93% | 72% | 38% | 17% | 7% | 3% | 52% | 24% | 31% | 17% | 24% |
| Nantong Zhiyun | 29 | 2.00 | 86% | 52% | 28% | 21% | 10% | 3% | 45% | 48% | 21% | 34% | 7% |
| Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 29 | 1.93 | 83% | 59% | 38% | 10% | 3% | 0% | 45% | 31% | 41% | 14% | 24% |
| Foshan Nashi FC | 8 | 3.88 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 63% | 63% | 25% | 63% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 13% |
| Shaanxi Union FC | 8 | 3.38 | 100% | 88% | 63% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 38% | 25% |
| Guangzhou E-Power FC | 8 | 3.00 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 88% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 13% |
| Meizhou Hakka | 8 | 3.00 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 50% | 13% | 50% | 0% | 38% |
| Nanjing City | 8 | 2.88 | 88% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 38% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 25% |
| Guangxi Hengchen | 8 | 2.50 | 100% | 63% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 63% | 25% | 13% | 25% | 13% |
| Suzhou Dongwu | 8 | 2.50 | 88% | 75% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 63% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 13% |
| Yanbian Longding | 8 | 2.50 | 100% | 75% | 50% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% |
| Changchun Yatai | 8 | 2.38 | 100% | 75% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 63% | 25% | 13% | 25% | 13% |
| Wuxi Wugou | 8 | 2.38 | 100% | 75% | 50% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 25% | 50% | 25% | 50% | 25% |
| Dalian Kuncheng City | 8 | 2.25 | 100% | 75% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 50% | 13% | 38% | 13% | 38% |
| Shenzhen Juniors FC | 8 | 2.25 | 75% | 63% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 63% | 25% | 38% | 0% | 13% |
| Shanghai Jiading Hui | 8 | 2.00 | 88% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 38% | 25% | 50% | 13% | 38% |
| Jiangxi Dingnan Unit | 8 | 1.88 | 75% | 63% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 13% |
| Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 8 | 1.75 | 75% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 38% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 13% |
| Nantong Zhiyun | 8 | 1.50 | 100% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 63% | 25% | 63% | 25% |
| Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 3.40 | 100% | 93% | 80% | 40% | 20% | 7% | 60% | 7% | 33% | 7% | 33% |
| Changchun Yatai | 15 | 3.13 | 100% | 80% | 67% | 33% | 20% | 13% | 60% | 33% | 7% | 33% | 7% |
| Guangxi Hengchen | 15 | 3.07 | 93% | 67% | 60% | 33% | 20% | 20% | 60% | 33% | 13% | 27% | 7% |
| Dalian Kuncheng City | 14 | 3.00 | 86% | 79% | 50% | 36% | 21% | 7% | 71% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 0% |
| Foshan Nashi FC | 15 | 3.00 | 93% | 80% | 53% | 33% | 27% | 7% | 60% | 13% | 33% | 7% | 27% |
| Shaanxi Union FC | 14 | 2.93 | 93% | 79% | 71% | 36% | 7% | 7% | 50% | 43% | 14% | 36% | 7% |
| Jiangxi Dingnan Unit | 15 | 2.87 | 87% | 80% | 53% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 80% | 13% | 20% | 0% | 7% |
| Shanghai Jiading Hui | 14 | 2.71 | 93% | 71% | 50% | 29% | 21% | 7% | 64% | 29% | 14% | 21% | 7% |
| Guangzhou E-Power FC | 14 | 2.64 | 93% | 86% | 43% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 50% | 50% | 7% | 43% | 0% |
| Shenzhen Juniors FC | 14 | 2.50 | 86% | 64% | 36% | 29% | 21% | 14% | 50% | 43% | 21% | 29% | 7% |
| Wuxi Wugou | 14 | 2.43 | 93% | 79% | 36% | 29% | 7% | 0% | 36% | 43% | 29% | 36% | 21% |
| Yanbian Longding | 14 | 2.43 | 86% | 71% | 50% | 29% | 7% | 0% | 57% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 14% |
| Nanjing City | 15 | 2.33 | 93% | 73% | 40% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 27% | 20% |
| Nantong Zhiyun | 14 | 2.21 | 100% | 50% | 29% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 36% | 57% | 7% | 57% | 7% |
| Suzhou Dongwu | 15 | 2.07 | 80% | 53% | 47% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 15 | 1.93 | 87% | 60% | 33% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 47% | 33% | 33% | 20% | 20% |
| Foshan Nashi FC | 14 | 3.71 | 100% | 86% | 64% | 57% | 43% | 21% | 57% | 14% | 29% | 14% | 29% |
| Jiangxi Dingnan Unit | 14 | 3.36 | 100% | 86% | 57% | 36% | 21% | 21% | 71% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% |
| Guangzhou E-Power FC | 15 | 3.20 | 100% | 87% | 67% | 40% | 20% | 7% | 73% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| Changchun Yatai | 14 | 3.14 | 100% | 93% | 71% | 43% | 7% | 0% | 79% | 0% | 21% | 0% | 21% |
| Wuxi Wugou | 15 | 3.00 | 100% | 80% | 60% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 53% | 20% | 27% | 20% | 27% |
| Shaanxi Union FC | 15 | 2.80 | 93% | 80% | 60% | 27% | 20% | 0% | 47% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 27% |
| Suzhou Dongwu | 14 | 2.79 | 93% | 71% | 43% | 36% | 14% | 14% | 71% | 7% | 29% | 0% | 21% |
| Shenzhen Juniors FC | 15 | 2.60 | 73% | 60% | 53% | 33% | 13% | 7% | 33% | 47% | 47% | 20% | 20% |
| Yanbian Longding | 15 | 2.53 | 87% | 73% | 47% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 47% | 33% | 33% | 20% | 20% |
| Guangxi Hengchen | 14 | 2.50 | 100% | 71% | 43% | 14% | 14% | 7% | 50% | 29% | 21% | 29% | 21% |
| Meizhou Hakka | 14 | 2.50 | 93% | 64% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 7% | 43% | 21% | 43% | 14% | 36% |
| Dalian Kuncheng City | 15 | 2.40 | 93% | 73% | 47% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 53% | 7% | 47% | 0% | 40% |
| Nanjing City | 14 | 2.36 | 93% | 71% | 36% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 57% | 14% | 36% | 7% | 29% |
| Shanghai Jiading Hui | 15 | 2.13 | 87% | 60% | 40% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 40% | 27% | 47% | 13% | 33% |
| Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 14 | 1.93 | 79% | 57% | 43% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 43% | 29% | 50% | 7% | 29% |
| Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 1.80 | 73% | 53% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 53% | 40% | 33% | 13% | 7% |
| ... | |||||||||||||
| League average | 91.4% | 72.8% | 50.0% | 27.6% | 14.7% | 6.9% | 54.3% | 27.2% | 27.2% | 18.5% | 18.5% | ||
| League average | 91.4% | 67.2% | 40.6% | 27.3% | 17.2% | 4.7% | 49.2% | 29.7% | 29.7% | 21.1% | 21.1% | ||
| League average | 91.4% | 72.8% | 50.0% | 27.6% | 14.7% | 6.9% | 54.3% | 32.8% | 21.6% | 24.1% | 12.9% | ||
| League average | 91.4% | 72.8% | 50.0% | 27.6% | 14.7% | 6.9% | 54.3% | 21.6% | 32.8% | 12.9% | 24.1% | ||
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS
The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.
SoccerSTATS.com Membership info
Goals Scored + Conceded (First-Half)
| Teams (Total) ↕ | GP ↕ | Avg ↕ | 0.5+ ↕ | 1.5+ ↕ | 2.5+ ↕ | 3.5+ ↕ | 4.5+ ↕ | 5.5+ ↕ | BTS ↕ | CS ↕ | FTS ↕ | WTN ↕ | LTN ↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dalian Kuncheng City | 29 | 1.62 | 76% | 52% | 17% | 7% | 7% | 3% | 34% | 45% | 45% | 21% | 21% |
| Changchun Yatai | 29 | 1.55 | 76% | 52% | 17% | 7% | 3% | 0% | 31% | 45% | 48% | 21% | 24% |
| Foshan Nashi FC | 29 | 1.52 | 83% | 45% | 17% | 3% | 3% | 0% | 14% | 28% | 76% | 10% | 59% |
| Jiangxi Dingnan Unit | 29 | 1.38 | 72% | 41% | 21% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 28% | 52% | 48% | 24% | 21% |
| Meizhou Hakka | 29 | 1.34 | 83% | 38% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 34% | 62% | 17% | 45% |
| Shaanxi Union FC | 29 | 1.34 | 69% | 45% | 17% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 28% | 59% | 45% | 28% | 14% |
| Guangzhou E-Power FC | 29 | 1.31 | 76% | 48% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 17% | 76% | 31% | 52% | 7% |
| Wuxi Wugou | 29 | 1.21 | 69% | 28% | 14% | 7% | 3% | 0% | 17% | 62% | 52% | 31% | 21% |
| Yanbian Longding | 29 | 1.17 | 76% | 34% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 52% | 52% | 28% | 28% |
| Nanjing City | 29 | 1.14 | 83% | 28% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 17% | 45% | 55% | 28% | 38% |
| Shanghai Jiading Hui | 29 | 1.10 | 62% | 34% | 10% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 48% | 69% | 10% | 31% |
| Shenzhen Juniors FC | 29 | 1.07 | 59% | 28% | 10% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 10% | 69% | 62% | 28% | 21% |
| Guangxi Hengchen | 29 | 1.00 | 66% | 28% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 17% | 59% | 59% | 24% | 24% |
| Nantong Zhiyun | 29 | 0.97 | 62% | 24% | 7% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 72% | 52% | 34% | 14% |
| Suzhou Dongwu | 29 | 0.90 | 62% | 17% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10% | 62% | 66% | 24% | 28% |
| Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 29 | 0.83 | 52% | 24% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10% | 76% | 62% | 28% | 14% |
| Dalian Kuncheng City | 14 | 1.71 | 71% | 57% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 43% | 57% | 29% | 29% | 0% |
| Changchun Yatai | 15 | 1.60 | 73% | 53% | 20% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 20% | 53% | 53% | 27% | 27% |
| Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 1.60 | 93% | 47% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 27% | 60% | 20% | 53% |
| Jiangxi Dingnan Unit | 15 | 1.53 | 80% | 47% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 47% | 40% | 27% | 20% |
| Nanjing City | 15 | 1.33 | 87% | 40% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 40% | 47% | 27% | 33% |
| Guangzhou E-Power FC | 14 | 1.29 | 79% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 71% | 29% | 50% | 7% |
| Shaanxi Union FC | 14 | 1.21 | 57% | 43% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 79% | 50% | 36% | 7% |
| Foshan Nashi FC | 15 | 1.20 | 67% | 47% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 40% | 80% | 7% | 47% |
| Guangxi Hengchen | 15 | 1.20 | 73% | 33% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 53% | 47% | 27% | 20% |
| Shanghai Jiading Hui | 14 | 1.14 | 71% | 29% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 29% | 36% | 64% | 7% | 36% |
| Wuxi Wugou | 14 | 1.14 | 64% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 14% | 64% | 57% | 29% | 21% |
| Yanbian Longding | 14 | 1.14 | 86% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 43% | 57% | 29% | 43% |
| Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 15 | 1.13 | 73% | 33% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 60% | 53% | 33% | 27% |
| Nantong Zhiyun | 14 | 0.86 | 50% | 14% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 86% | 57% | 36% | 7% |
| Suzhou Dongwu | 15 | 0.73 | 53% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 67% | 73% | 20% | 27% |
| Shenzhen Juniors FC | 14 | 0.57 | 43% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 71% | 79% | 14% | 21% |
| Foshan Nashi FC | 14 | 1.86 | 100% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 14% | 14% | 71% | 14% | 71% |
| Dalian Kuncheng City | 15 | 1.53 | 80% | 47% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 27% | 33% | 60% | 13% | 40% |
| Shenzhen Juniors FC | 15 | 1.53 | 73% | 40% | 20% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 13% | 67% | 47% | 40% | 20% |
| Changchun Yatai | 14 | 1.50 | 79% | 50% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 43% | 36% | 43% | 14% | 21% |
| Shaanxi Union FC | 15 | 1.47 | 80% | 47% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% |
| Guangzhou E-Power FC | 15 | 1.33 | 73% | 47% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 80% | 33% | 53% | 7% |
| Wuxi Wugou | 15 | 1.27 | 73% | 33% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 20% |
| Jiangxi Dingnan Unit | 14 | 1.21 | 64% | 36% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 57% | 57% | 21% | 21% |
| Yanbian Longding | 15 | 1.20 | 67% | 47% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 60% | 47% | 27% | 13% |
| Meizhou Hakka | 14 | 1.07 | 71% | 29% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 43% | 64% | 14% | 36% |
| Suzhou Dongwu | 14 | 1.07 | 71% | 21% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 57% | 57% | 29% | 29% |
| Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 1.07 | 73% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 20% |
| Shanghai Jiading Hui | 15 | 1.07 | 53% | 40% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 60% | 73% | 13% | 27% |
| Nanjing City | 14 | 0.93 | 79% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 50% | 64% | 29% | 43% |
| Guangxi Hengchen | 14 | 0.79 | 57% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 64% | 71% | 21% | 29% |
| Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 14 | 0.50 | 29% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 93% | 71% | 21% | 0% |
| ... | |||||||||||||
| League average | 70.3% | 35.3% | 11.6% | 2.6% | 1.3% | 0.4% | 19.4% | 55.2% | 55.2% | 25.4% | 25.4% | ||
| League average | 70.3% | 35.3% | 11.6% | 2.6% | 1.3% | 0.4% | 19.4% | 55.6% | 54.7% | 25.9% | 25.0% | ||
| League average | 70.3% | 35.3% | 11.6% | 2.6% | 1.3% | 0.4% | 19.4% | 54.7% | 55.6% | 25.0% | 25.9% | ||
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS
The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.
SoccerSTATS.com Membership info
Goals Scored + Conceded (Second-Half)
| Teams (Total) ↕ | GP ↕ | Avg ↕ | 0.5+ ↕ | 1.5+ ↕ | 2.5+ ↕ | 3.5+ ↕ | 4.5+ ↕ | 5.5+ ↕ | BTS ↕ | CS ↕ | FTS ↕ | WTN ↕ | LTN ↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foshan Nashi FC | 29 | 1.83 | 86% | 45% | 31% | 14% | 3% | 3% | 28% | 38% | 48% | 24% | 34% |
| Guangxi Hengchen | 29 | 1.79 | 86% | 48% | 31% | 10% | 3% | 0% | 34% | 48% | 31% | 34% | 17% |
| Jiangxi Dingnan Unit | 29 | 1.72 | 83% | 52% | 24% | 10% | 3% | 0% | 38% | 31% | 48% | 14% | 31% |
| Guangzhou E-Power FC | 29 | 1.62 | 76% | 48% | 21% | 14% | 3% | 0% | 34% | 48% | 41% | 24% | 17% |
| Meizhou Hakka | 29 | 1.62 | 72% | 45% | 24% | 14% | 3% | 3% | 28% | 38% | 62% | 10% | 34% |
| Changchun Yatai | 29 | 1.59 | 83% | 41% | 31% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 38% | 41% | 38% | 24% | 21% |
| Shaanxi Union FC | 29 | 1.52 | 83% | 38% | 28% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 55% | 41% | 38% | 24% |
| Suzhou Dongwu | 29 | 1.52 | 76% | 38% | 24% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 31% | 45% | 48% | 21% | 24% |
| Wuxi Wugou | 29 | 1.52 | 79% | 45% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 24% | 55% | 41% | 34% | 21% |
| Shenzhen Juniors FC | 29 | 1.48 | 66% | 45% | 21% | 10% | 3% | 3% | 28% | 55% | 52% | 21% | 17% |
| Shanghai Jiading Hui | 29 | 1.31 | 72% | 38% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 62% | 45% | 34% | 17% |
| Yanbian Longding | 29 | 1.31 | 72% | 34% | 17% | 3% | 3% | 0% | 17% | 59% | 52% | 31% | 24% |
| Nanjing City | 29 | 1.21 | 76% | 24% | 10% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 14% | 48% | 62% | 24% | 38% |
| Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 29 | 1.10 | 62% | 31% | 14% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 17% | 52% | 69% | 14% | 31% |
| Dalian Kuncheng City | 29 | 1.07 | 59% | 31% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 24% | 52% | 66% | 10% | 24% |
| Nantong Zhiyun | 29 | 1.03 | 62% | 24% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 24% | 66% | 48% | 28% | 10% |
| Shenzhen Juniors FC | 14 | 1.93 | 71% | 57% | 29% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 43% | 50% | 36% | 21% | 7% |
| Guangxi Hengchen | 15 | 1.87 | 80% | 47% | 40% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 33% | 53% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| Foshan Nashi FC | 15 | 1.80 | 87% | 47% | 27% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 27% | 33% | 53% | 20% | 40% |
| Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 1.80 | 87% | 53% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 27% | 53% | 13% | 40% |
| Shaanxi Union FC | 14 | 1.71 | 86% | 43% | 36% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 36% | 57% | 21% | 43% | 7% |
| Shanghai Jiading Hui | 14 | 1.57 | 71% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 29% | 64% | 36% | 36% | 7% |
| Changchun Yatai | 15 | 1.53 | 87% | 33% | 27% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 53% | 33% | 40% | 20% |
| Guangzhou E-Power FC | 14 | 1.36 | 71% | 43% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 14% | 71% | 43% | 43% | 14% |
| Nantong Zhiyun | 14 | 1.36 | 86% | 29% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 29% | 64% | 21% | 50% | 7% |
| Jiangxi Dingnan Unit | 15 | 1.33 | 73% | 40% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 40% | 53% | 13% | 27% |
| Suzhou Dongwu | 15 | 1.33 | 67% | 33% | 20% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 27% | 53% | 53% | 20% | 20% |
| Dalian Kuncheng City | 14 | 1.29 | 64% | 43% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 36% | 50% | 50% | 14% | 14% |
| Wuxi Wugou | 14 | 1.29 | 71% | 36% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 64% | 50% | 36% | 21% |
| Yanbian Longding | 14 | 1.29 | 64% | 43% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 71% | 43% | 36% | 7% |
| Nanjing City | 15 | 1.00 | 73% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 60% | 60% | 33% | 33% |
| Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 15 | 0.80 | 53% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 67% | 67% | 20% | 20% |
| Jiangxi Dingnan Unit | 14 | 2.14 | 93% | 64% | 36% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 43% | 21% | 43% | 14% | 36% |
| Guangzhou E-Power FC | 15 | 1.87 | 80% | 53% | 33% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 53% | 27% | 40% | 7% | 20% |
| Foshan Nashi FC | 14 | 1.86 | 86% | 43% | 36% | 21% | 0% | 0% | 29% | 43% | 43% | 29% | 29% |
| Wuxi Wugou | 15 | 1.73 | 87% | 53% | 20% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 33% | 47% | 33% | 33% | 20% |
| Guangxi Hengchen | 14 | 1.71 | 93% | 50% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 36% | 43% | 29% | 36% | 21% |
| Suzhou Dongwu | 14 | 1.71 | 86% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 36% | 36% | 43% | 21% | 29% |
| Changchun Yatai | 14 | 1.64 | 79% | 50% | 36% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 50% | 29% | 43% | 7% | 21% |
| Meizhou Hakka | 14 | 1.43 | 57% | 36% | 29% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 21% | 50% | 71% | 7% | 29% |
| Nanjing City | 14 | 1.43 | 79% | 29% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 21% | 36% | 64% | 14% | 43% |
| Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 14 | 1.43 | 71% | 43% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 21% | 36% | 71% | 7% | 43% |
| Shaanxi Union FC | 15 | 1.33 | 80% | 33% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 53% | 60% | 33% | 40% |
| Yanbian Longding | 15 | 1.33 | 80% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 13% | 47% | 60% | 27% | 40% |
| Shanghai Jiading Hui | 15 | 1.07 | 73% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 60% | 53% | 33% | 27% |
| Shenzhen Juniors FC | 15 | 1.07 | 60% | 33% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 60% | 67% | 20% | 27% |
| Dalian Kuncheng City | 15 | 0.87 | 53% | 20% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 53% | 80% | 7% | 33% |
| Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 0.73 | 40% | 20% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 20% | 67% | 73% | 7% | 13% |
| ... | |||||||||||||
| League average | 74.6% | 39.2% | 21.6% | 7.3% | 1.7% | 0.9% | 26.3% | 49.6% | 49.6% | 24.1% | 24.1% | ||
| League average | 74.6% | 39.2% | 21.6% | 7.3% | 1.7% | 0.9% | 26.3% | 54.7% | 44.4% | 29.3% | 19.0% | ||
| League average | 74.6% | 39.2% | 21.6% | 7.3% | 1.7% | 0.9% | 26.3% | 44.4% | 54.7% | 19.0% | 29.3% | ||
LISTING ONLY 5 TEAMS
The Members version of the website displays the complete table for logged-in members.
SoccerSTATS.com Membership info
Both Teams Scored
Failed To Score
Clean Sheets
Scored in Both Halves
Season summary
First Goal Impact & Lead Retention
Home team scored first:
47.8%
No goal scored:
8.6%
Away team scored first:
43.5%
Avg minute home team scored first: 34.0 min.
Avg minute away team scored first: 27.3 min.
Points Per Game after scoring first: 2.28
Points Per Game after conceding first: 0.50
Lead-defending rate at home:
65.5%
Lead-defending rate away:
51.5%
Equalizing rate at home:
48.5%
Equalizing rate away:
34.5%
Home team lead duration:
26.2%
Teams level in goals:
49.5%
Away team lead duration:
24.3%
Access Denied
Your current synced membership level is: None
The full Export feature for this table is available with a Supporter Membership.